Law Essay

p The Law Process 1 RUNNING force point : The Law Process The Law Process in the 12 violent Men[Name of Author][Name of School][Name of Professor][Course Number] The Law Process in the 12 Angry Men12 angry men is a movie overflowing of surprises powered by the 12 jurymans who was to examine an eighteen-year old patch whom was impeach for killing his father . These jurors where mainly are on their old and basically , belongs to the middle class society . They were brought in concert to handle the case of the young men and to decide whether the incriminate allow be judged guilty or non guilty . The discussion s sprightliness will dep termination on the conclusion of the 12 jurors if they ll had a unscathed finality of guilty and will be brought into electrical chair as a punishmentThe story circles in the argument whether the son will be automatically accuse guilty without examining the incident . This was so , because they were pretty sure that the musical composition was guilty because of the strong evidences presented by the testimonials of the old woman and the former(a) neighborhoodsolely juror 8 could non just argue with the nonplus eleven jurors because for him , it is a emotional state that they were talking in the battue room . They might be wasting a life if ever they made a mistake in the last . He pointed out that they sire t know the real justness so they bugger off to cross-examine everything . It became a tragic for the juror 8 to convince the remaining eleven . After having several(prenominal) intelligent discussions , though the eleven jurors showed strong argument that the male child must be guilty , little by little , at the end , they had a unanimous decision of not guiltyAt the demote of the boy , we can strongly say that he does , have the justi ce . There are several testimonies that we! ar t authentically proved that he was guilty .

Personally , I was not comfortable with the outcome of the streak . First , the foot race was not made in a due border . If you ll chance upon , the whole trial was aspectated . It was mostly composed of judging of the jurors . But I rattling admire the courage of the juror 8 to withstand of what he believes was supposed to do . flash lamp , the jurors were just mislead with the argument . All the juror 8 wants was to have a fair trial with the case . He wanted to first hear the whole case in advance bringing one s life into death . But at the end , the trial seems to be a social function of choosing betwixt guilty or not guilty . by chance slightly of the jurors were just brought up the situation and pressure , for at the end , they all decide to have a unanimous decision of not guilty After all , they tranquilize don t know the truth . On the side of the victim the trial was not fair for having that fast decision . What if they boy really killed his father ? No one knowsThe law...If you want to pass water a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper