FAHRENHEIT 911 Essay -- essays research papers

The title of "Fahrenheit 9/11" is a play on the title of the famous Ray Bradbury novel, "Fahrenheit 451" in which society has been modify into an authoritarian, repressive regime, in which subversive ideas are crimes and books are burned. In the book, a lonely protagonist is awakened to this reality and joins the struggle to keep resistance dissidence alive.In Michael Moores movie, he leads an above-ground assault on the Bush Presidency, questioning his legitimacy, his character, abilities and, almost of all, his attempt to fight terror through the struggle in Iraq. And similarly, his regularity of attack is by trying to bring to light the points that those in advocate get down tried to suppress.Just like every Moore movie, it shows people face stupid to humorous effect and it shows the heroic tales of common people who have suffered tragedy. And Moore blames their plight on the rich and powerful. In his other movies, the presidents of General Motors and the issue Rifle Association, for instance, bear the brunt of his blame. In this movie, its George W.In its best moments, the movie is a strong, anti-war documentary. It has truly moving moments of bereaved loved ones, mangled bodies in the streets, skeptical s grey-hairediers in Iraq, angry Iraqis and innocent teenagers being manipulated into engageing. In this instruction, the movie presents a version of the war on Iraq that isnt shown much in the media. It improves our understanding of the war by giving it a human face.Asking members of Congress to enlist their children in the war was a good idea, as it emphasized an strategic point of his that its the poor and uneducated that fight the wars that politicians vote for. But it was probably one of those things that should have remained just a neat idea - the unquestionable confrontations are just embarrassing for Moore, the politicians and the audience. Perhaps its an embarrasing reality we all ought to face, alone(predicate) ma ybe its just tasteless. Either way, the point remains forceful the fortitude of all these disadvantaged young people should only be utilise as a last resort.But Moores movie isnt just an anti-war movie. authority of the movie is an attempt to question and expose the political images being projected. This starts finish off with a dreamy sequence of Al Gore celebrating victory in Florida that, Moore says, was manipulated by Fox television into a Bush vict... ... understandable to a wide audience, inviting citizens from all walks of life and levels of education to be engaged. But his arguments are, without a doubt, simplifications and he doesnt even bring up arguments that challenge his own, let alone take them seriously.Moore insists that all his facts are correct and even hired an old fact checker for the New Yorker to make sure. But this, of course, doesnt come to grips with the fact that much of the Bush statements he objects to are also, strictly speaking, factually correct. The trueness about facts is not self evident, as he knows the signifi go offce of facts can be manipulated by those with just a camera just as easily as by those in power. In an era of mass-media politics-a far cry from the original political debates in Athens-"Fahrenheit 9/11" is an uneasy compromise between populism and propaganda. The things it has to say are relevant and in-chief(postnominal) and should be heard - but hopefully, they are just part of a larger, more even-handed discussion. Perhaps, the success of this movie is a recognition of the fact that the way this discussion gets carried out in the modern age is by round it into a form of entertainment.